Hmmm. I think this was the most confusing class at the show.

The general thought of most of the entrants ( and onlookers for that matter ) was that the idea was to tell a story in miniature, something that would come across obviously in the setting and figures within it.

Having soken to one of the judges, this didnt' seem to be the case, and that they - the judges - had to work out what was going on, and the more difficult or lateral the thinking, the better or more highly aawarded would be the piece.

Personally I think this is verging on pretentious bollocks, but then, I'm just a thick northerner, and what do I know ?

The consensus after the judging seems to be that few if any seem to understand the link between the idea behind the class, and what was necessary to produce to win.

However, my genuine congratulations to those that got a medal, you did darn well.